GalimAI Data · Tribunal intelligence

Company vs individual: the tribunal cases you can actually reach

Not every tribunal respondent is a private individual. GalimAI data shows around one in five cases involve a company landlord - and why those are the reachable, off-market ones.

367
company tribunal cases
~21%
of all cases
Contactable
company-owned

Not every tribunal respondent is a private individual. In GalimAI's tribunal records, 367 of 1,720 cases - around one in five - involve a company landlord, identifiable by Ltd, Limited or LLP markers in the respondent name. That distinction matters more than it looks.

A tribunal ruling is a moment of pressure - and pressure is where motivated, off-market sellers come from. You can size these owners in your area and reach them directly, before they ever list.

Tribunal cases: company vs individual

Individual-respondent cases1,353Company-respondent cases367

A company landlord leaves a paper trail an individual does not: filed accounts, a registered director, a cash position, a charge history. That is what lets us match a tribunal ruling to a financial profile - and it is why company-owned cases are the reachable ones. When 180 of an earlier London enforcement sample of 412 cases targeted companies rather than people, the same logic held.

Company-owned means contactable

For an investor, a company respondent is not a dead end on a decision notice - it is a registered entity with a director who can be approached directly and off-market. That is the difference between reading about distress and acting on it.

Related reading: the tribunal landlord profile, where tribunal cases cluster, how to find tribunal-flagged landlords.

Why it's an opportunity

A company respondent is a registered, reachable entity - not a dead end.

Find company tribunal landlords near you

Use the GalimAI portal to size company-owned, tribunal-linked landlords in a target area.

Search the portalBook a call

Common questions

How many tribunal cases involve companies?

In GalimAI's records, 367 of 1,720 cases - around one in five - involve a company landlord.

Why focus on company respondents?

Companies file accounts and have registered directors, so a ruling can be matched to a financial profile and the owner reached directly.

Is the rest individuals?

Most remaining cases are private individuals, who are harder to profile and match.

Data source: GalimAI proprietary analysis of First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and local-authority landlord enforcement records matched to Companies House, HM Land Registry and EPC data, aggregated and current for 2026. Tribunal coverage is strongest in London. Figures are approximate and directional - the matched sample is the subset of tribunal respondents we can link to a registered company, and owner-base totals drift slightly between queries. Use these figures to size and understand a market, not to identify an individual company or person.